But okay - we all have different opinions on this. However, I think that anyone who refuses to dona

You are walking on a cold February morning when - BOOM - get run over out of a motorist. Hi and ho, fight on, the ambulance will take you to the nearest hospital. Now that you are in the emergency room doctors discover oscar branzani that you need a new liver. No donate, and you die.
One can argue both for and against. We can start by living persons. oscar branzani Why should anyone risk his life to save you? I mean, I sure is not going to expose myself to possible infections and everything else that an intervention can mean to save someone I do not know. But that's the way I, along with the rest of us ordinary people.
Then, it is certainly oscar branzani a different story if there is someone who is close to me. But then we have our own personal reasons for why we want to save the individual. Now if you do not have people with the appropriate blood type, what do you do?
Is it justified to impose oscar branzani a mandatory obligation as citizens need to donate organs if needed to save someone else's life? I think we all would have liked to receive oscar branzani this help, but very few would want to give it. However, if the sensor is ... dead?
When the subject touches dead people, I think it is relatively easy to determine - it should be allowed. Sure you can see it like that violerar the dead man's honor, or the like, but how does it waste of organs? The dead will hardly need bodies anymore. I can understand not wanting to donate something that belongs to one's face (if eye transplant now have been possible ...), because then the corpse in the coffin look hopeless out when to say their last goodbyes. But otherwise, to donate a liver .. is that wrong?
In my opinion, it is equally wrong to not give out organs to dying that it is not to give out food to starving. If it is available - use it. Organ - like food - gets bad after a while, so why not consume it immediately?
But okay - we all have different opinions on this. However, I think that anyone who refuses to donate their organs may well, if so, obtain a "donate-not" card, instead of us who want to donate today must say. Why can not it be the "standard" that you should help others after their death, and if you want something else you have to take the initiative for it? Maybe it has to do with donations still a relatively new field, and our outdated laws have failed to recognize it yet. What do I know ...
You May use HTML tags These and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym oscar branzani title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Proudly powered by WordPress