The reason for writing this opinion piece comes with a number of events that have occurred in recent days. On Wednesday, November 20 this year announced a number of Bitcoin exchange that some banks (including Rabobank) made it no longer possible oscar fashions to use for this type of companies. Payments
Because I always have done with some of these companies, good business, I contacted my local bank to find out what was going on. I was transferred oscar fashions to an employee oscar fashions who-me to my great surprise, said that "The Ethics Committee of the Rabobank had sent an internal memo stating that the bank was not able to buy. Bitcoins I was surprised oscar fashions for two reasons.
1) I can still determine where I spend my money on yourself? (Which the lady in question replied, "Yes, but not with an account of the Rabobank ') 2) We see exactly happen here as we saw previously done with the music / film industry oscar fashions and then the same industry publishers.
The Volkskrant published an article by Peter de Waard. Interestingly, many things oscar fashions in the article were that were based on inaccuracies and opinions that were brought as facts. Mr. Worth writes from a number of misunderstandings and misconceptions. Something not quite unusual where the Bitcoin concerns and possibly underlies the choice of Rabobank to make the payments. Impossible De Waard wrote among other things:
Which relies Mr. Worth the idea that there may be may be a miljardenoplichterij? He knows that there is a peer-to-peer network where he can make them yourself He is free open source software (read: block-chain) to download and use the network that the transaction validates part. Now that still requires some technical knowledge, but it will not be long before these roads passable for everyone will be. There are more and more websites that offer this service and / or software. : The Worth writes
The author (s) of Bitcoin is / are indeed unknown. The first article in which the Bitcoin is presented openly to read (. Pdf) online and written by the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto. There can be mentioned why Satoshi has chosen to remain anonymous and just being positive for the Bitcoin many reasons. To name but a few.
1) The first famous peer-to-peer network was Napster because Napster had a headquarters, were people who did not agree with the services oscar fashions that Napster oscar fashions offered to the company steps and sue them. Bitcoin is a crypto-currency. Bitcoin is proportional to Napster as sharing peer-to-peer to cryptocurrencies with the only difference that Bitcoin is decentralized to avoid. Above problem
2) According to Ted Nelson (video) oscar fashions Satoshi Nakamoto is the pseudonym of Shinichi Mochizuki. Nelson argues that it is not understandable for Western cultures to provide such an invention without credit to the world, but it's just unusual for the Japanese culture oscar fashions of honor to usurp for similar acts. Honor yourself
3) In the introduction to his article Satoshi writes: "... Commerce on the Internet has come to rely almost EXCLUSIVELY on financial institutions serving as trusted third parties to process electronic payments While the system works well enough for most transactions, it still. Suffers from the inherent weaknesses of the trust-based model ... "
The banking sector has not really oscar fashions built up a good reputation in the recent past where fair trade. To make a crypto currency as clean as possible an introduction anonymity is preferable to fame. Due prominence is the probability that the discussion about conflict of interest or influence on the price wrong unpack many male larger.
"There is no central bank or other supervisor who keeps an eye on the sail or intervenes. And there is no government to the rescue as the virtual bitcoinbank as too big to fail to overturn state." oscar fashions
That is exactly what they want to avoid. It is best to draw. Comparison with energy recovery A major advantage of wind / solar energy compared to nuclear energy (apart from all the other threads this topic may yield) that a third party should be in the game. Nuclear Wind / solar power you yourself as a human owner of the energy. This also applies oscar fashions to the cryptocurrencies. I can do a deal with someone else, without the interference of anyone. The Bitcoin is a perfect example of a decentralized currency that the people themselves and not a government agency or corporation.
What is the point, which is the Bitcoin? If you think that Bitcoin is only interesting if call
No comments:
Post a Comment